EAST BAY CITIZEN. EVERYWHERE SINCE 2009

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Barbara Lee on U.S. Reaction to Plight of Immigrant Minors: 'I Felt Ashamed'

East Bay Rep. Barbara Lee
CONGRESS | 13TH DISTRICT | Speaking before the Congressional Progress Caucus in Washington Tuesday, Rep. Barbara Lee reacted to harrowing testimony from young undocumented immigrants who have recently fled conflict in their homelands, saying, "I felt ashamed and I ask my colleagues: are you talking about America?"

The U.S.-Mexico border has been inundated this year with nearly 50,000 unaccompanied young people fleeing mostly Central American countries for the United States.

"Is this America, where you have fled and were treated as you were," Lee said, according the CBS News Washington, D.C. affiliate. "So I want to say to you, this country is a country that stands for liberty and justice for all.”

President Obama recently proposed allocating over $3 billion to alleviate the flood of immigrants at the border. That plan, however, is being stymied by House Republicans. Lee, who is up for re-election this fall, urged for a solution to help the young immigrants reunite with their families in the states.

“So your powerful words and presence and testimony today really have reminded us of what we stand for and who we are as a country," said Lee. "I look forward to working with all of my colleagues to find a way forward so that you and all of the children will feel safe and secure and reunited with your families. And just know that we as Americans appreciate your voices and communicating with us the tragic realities of what is taking place in your countries.”

188 comments :

By MW:

So Barbara Lee, and who is a prominent member and major power broker in that huge organized crime ring that calls itself the Democratic Party, is supposedly extremely concerned about the plight of undocumented aliens who are coming into the USA.

I would think that the demagogues, charlatans, phonies, and big windbags who compose the leadership of the DP, in other words, Feinstein, Boxer, and Barbara Lee, etc, would be much more concerned about conditions in the US than about trying to get help and aid for undocumented aliens coming in from Mexico.

And especially since Barbara Lee's district is largely composed of Oakland, and which has tons of problems, and including one of the very highest murder rates in the entire country, Barbara Lee is the very last person who should be putting a lot of time and effort into worrying about aiding undocumented aliens who want to enter and permanently stay in the US, and while her homebase, in other words Oakland, is going to hell in a handbasket.

Of course the real reason that such prominent members of the DP as Obama and Barbara Lee, etc, and who pretend to be great liberals and wonderful humanitarians, want to put out the welcome mat for undocumented aliens is that the DP constantly needs fresh supplies of gullible and uneducated people to be present if it is to have chance to win elections.

Barbara Lee speaks for me and most of the Bay Area!
Biggest windbag of all MW certainly doesn't!

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

All you Tea Party sexists are the same. It's not a loophole, but a U.S. law signed by George Bush. All refugees are entitled to a hearing before a judge to decide if they should be sent back or not. These children sure qualify. Get on board a-hole or get out of the way yourself.

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Anon 9:16, you are the one with your head up your sexist ass. Your Republican conservative friends just blew up any legislation that could help with the refugee children situation. They are entitled to a judicial hearing according to U.S. law. You need to tell your Republican friends to get the hell out of the way. Go back to school and get your GED. What a simpleton.

Son, or daughter. We'll just stick with the eponymous bitch:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Anon 12:16
Just how big an ignoramus are you. It's the Republicans that are in the way and to blame for failing to fix problems at the border. They have refused to provide the necessary resources to deal with what they call a serious problem because the Tea Party Republicans are acting like children and need to grow up. Calling on you to grow up and start acting like an adult also.

The bill you cite has no chance because the Republicans can't get out of their own way. In the meantime the laws of our country say the refugees must have their day in court to determine if these children can be sent back safely. We are a nation of laws and you don't get to choose which ones to obey for the rest of us or for our nation. What an anarchist you are!

In the meantime, we bring you back to reality, bitch.

Nation of laws mean the rule of law:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Deport them. Plain and simple. They're coming here to get on welfare. Tell Obama to obey the laws since he refuses to obey them. And since we're deporting Illegals send that wetback Tavares and his buddy Nick Terry back to Mexico.

Send the butt sucking leaches back! Don't give them a free handout when they never paid into the system!

Anyone blaming Republicans for this are shit sucking retards hell bent on seeing Comrade Chairman Maobama destroy this Republic. You delushinal white libtards and whitey hating minorities are in for a real rude awakening if the Messicans take over. They hate whitey with a passion and sure as hell won't fund lazy blacks sucking up trillions of dollars in the Bibs me datz.Enough is enough!

Wow: The last four posts show how extreme the Tea Party is. Have to laugh at their ignorance and lack of education! No wonder they are slowly fading away.

As the writer of the first of four, and no more, comments, I object to being called a Tea Party person. Fact is I am a Democrat, though very disillusioned to be sure at this time and from the right wing of the party, though a registered Democrat regardless. Have been for the past 30 years. Sorry to disappoint you.

Those who disparage our laws and seek to push us further and further to the left, so that the tree branch breaks, will continue to get push back from me. I know exactly who you people are. It's clear everyday of the week. You walk the streets of Oakland, Hayward, Berkeley. You hate Israel at all costs. She's an 'illegal occupier,' you want 'open borders' for the illegals. 'Nobody is illegal' is your rant. Yes, they are.

Just like the religious nuts took over the Republican part more than 35 years ago, you ultra-left have tried to hijack the Democratic party. Extremes on both ends of the spectrum and in both dominant parties. For my part, I'll continue to fight and push back against you self-appointed 'Progressives.' Fact is you wouldn't understand the meaning of a true progressive if one was walking down the street and was in your face.

I can't speak for the previous three commentators, but definitely no Tea Party person in me. Make no mistake, though, I'll continue to push back against your ultra-liberal extremeism, and I always give better than I get. I don't take prisoners in this war.

In the meantime, we bring you back to reality, bitch.

Nation of laws mean the rule of law:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Anon above: How many times are you going to say the same thing? You are an extreme right wing thoughtless white male who is both sexist and racist and thinks like the Tea Party, even if you don't belong. Glad you are a minority in our nation and state.

Going to keep repeating until you get with the game, bitch.

As for my race and gender, you are really speculating, bitch.

You still don't get it, so school is back in session:

Nation of laws mean the rule of law:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Until you hold your tongue and cease and desist, I shall continue to repost. Your being a mute will remedy my reposts.

Anon 1:10
Just how big an ignoramus are you. It's the Republicans that are in the way and to blame for failing to fix problems at the border. They have refused to provide the necessary resources to deal with what they call a serious problem because the Tea Party Republicans are acting like children and need to grow up. Calling on you to grow up and start acting like an adult also.

The bill you cite has no chance because the Republicans can't get out of their own way. In the meantime the laws of our country say the refugees must have their day in court to determine if these children can be sent back safely. We are a nation of laws and you don't get to choose which ones to obey for the rest of us or for our nation. What an anarchist you are!

Anon at 1:10 who's posted the same post many times;

The conservative editorial board of The Wall Street Journal reamed into congressional Republicans in an editorial published in Saturday's paper, after the House passed a bill Friday night that effectively would put the status of nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants in limbo.

House Republicans passed legislation Friday night to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program established unilaterally by President Barack Obama in 2012. The program shields hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation.

The WSJ editorial board wrote, however, that the adding on of the DACA legislation to the package only provided " another spectacle of internal disarray" on what should be a path to a Senate majority in November.

From the editorial:

"The bill should have been a moment to redirect attention to President Obama's cynical handling of the border problem and to the Democratic Party's immigration divisions. Instead the GOP again gave the country the impression that its highest policy priority is to deport as many children as rapidly as possible back from wherever they came. [...]

The GOP's Deportation Caucus—led by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions and Ted Cruz of Texas—lobbied House conservatives to resist any immigration compromise and pick a fight with Mr. Boehner. The dissenters demanded an array of policy changes, most notably new restrictions on the President's executive order allowing some undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children to remain in the country.

Readers may recall that the last Republican in an election year to support deporting immigrant children brought here through no fault of their own was Mitt Romney. A splendid voter attraction that was."

What a dope. Tavares isn't Mexican. School yourself before you school others with your own stupidity. Save your psycho rants for someone who takes you seriously . I'll save you the trouble of replying, I'm a bitch, whore, fat ass, whore-bitch-fat ass.....I can lose weight, stop whoring around and being a bitch, but you 'll always be stupid.

I agree with 3:45. The conservative extremes have assured me they will never be able to elect another president through the end of this century. Thank you for assuring Democratic victory in 2016 and beyond. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot and destroying your Republican party.

1:10 has about half the posts on this string and I agree is a sexist and racist. 1:10 you are the one with your head up your sexist ass. Your Republican conservative friends just blew up any legislation that could help with the refugee children situation. They are entitled to a judicial hearing according to U.S. law. You need to tell your Republican friends to get the hell out of the way. Go back to school and get your GED. What a simpleton. The Tea Party won't let any meaningful legislation get through that has a chance of being signed into law. So the existing law stands that guarantees the refugee children a hearing before a judge. A majority of Americans don't want the young children sent back if they will be killed!

Boy, it looks like the last five posters, otherwise know as one-in-the-same, really can't take it. They don't believe in the rule of law at all. Only laws that they happen to like. I'm going to stay away from the hyperbole, chants of racism, sexism, etc. and simply put the blame where it belongs--on the extreme elements in BOTH parties.

The Republicans might not be able to get it together, but they GET IT. Loudly and clearly, they get it. You naysayers simply don't agree with it. Fine. That's what elections are all about. At present a majority of the country, for lack of a better quick slogan agrees with 'return to sender.' The Democrats, other than the great Henry Cuellar of Texas, [He really is a great guy, and he GETS it.], don't have a clue. As a Democrat it really pains me to write this but the party is going to be cut off at the dick, and it deserves to be, since it is an apologist for law breakers and illegals galore. As an ardent ENVIRONMENTALIST and one who is pro-abortion, it kills me to see the Republicans take both the House and Senate, and they will, because these issues will both be thrown under the train.

Until Democrats stop giving in to the ultra liberal union whores from Berkeley, Oakland, Hayward and the like, they will continue to lose. They will have brought this on themselves and will reap what the sew. The party must be purged of the Jesse Jacksons, Pete Starks--than G-d he's gone, and other radical whores who pull the rest of down with them. Cut the cancers lose and then throw them into the fire.

Moderation such as Cornyn-Cuellar--look it up to understand it--are the only solution which can combat this epidemic. The border must be secured and we must deport like there is no tomorrow. Ahora mismo! Andole!

It looks like the last poster, otherwise know as one-in-the-same, really can't take it. He doesn't believe in the rule of law at all. Only laws that he happens to like. The LAW that Bush signed says that refugees have a right to a hearing before they are deported to see if they are in danger if sent back. There is a backlog because Republicans have been loathe to spend the money to get the required number of judges, and heaven forbid the ones the President nominates. These young children will be treated humanely like the LAW says they will. Listen and learn, and then be proud you live in America which doesn't send children back to their death.

Back to their death??? Kiss my ass you libtard. These illegal aliens will have no greater chance of getting killed in their native country than they will in any ghetto in America. The benefit of sending these illegal alien criminals back is that we AMERICANS, DO YOU HEAR....AMERICANS stand less of a chance of meeting an untimely death at the hands of these Illegal Aliens are are prone to criminal activity.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and while 11:14 has chosen to plagiarize my comments and then twist them her way, the bitch would do well to understand that whether it happens now through the bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation that the Democrats are blocking, that reform is coming and the loophole will be closed.

Let me elucidate, daughter. The USA returns illegals from both Canada and Mexico without your precious hearings. The law that Bush signed has been exploited to no end because of the loophole which has a provision for such a hearing as you refer to. We are going to plug that leaking 'life preserver' and return the illegals post-haste. Now, if Obama wants to help lead in that regard, wonderful. If not, he will pay a horrible price this November when he loses the senate in addition to the House. He will be effectively neutered and become the lamest of lame ducks for the final two years of his presidency. It will simply be the game of running the clock out and starting anew in 2016. The choice is his and the Democrats to make.

Thank you for your kind words and thoughts, 7:00, but we can't be too hard on the bitch. After all, she is simply crawling out of her dark hole, the one where the sun don't never shine!

It looks like the last 2 posts, and more than half of the posts come from the same sexist and racist person. It's pretty clear because you have catch words and phrases that give you away. You should actually do some reading on the issues before spouting your anti-refugee hatred. Have you ever read the words on the statue of liberty? Every article, even the ones from the right-wing press, admit that many of these children would be in danger of losing their lives if they were forced to return home.

Sorry, bitch. Can only take credit for the last posting. The other is clearly from an American patriot.

By the way, the prophetic words you reference were penned by the poet Emma Goldman, herself a LEGAL immigrant. You really need to both learn history, rule of law, and become educated before you cast aspersions.

We're sure that is asking way too much from you, bitch.

It looks like you like to lie like most conservatives. Your style is very unimaginative and distinctive. No civilized country rejects child refugees at risk.

Not refugees; economic migrants If that were the case, then they wouldn't trek all the way to Los Estados Unidos. Many morre countries between El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala.

This is all about getting the dinero $$$ that is elusive down south. Might as well end the journey in Mexico. Oh wait, poverty there, too.

No cigar, kid.

By the way, try to get an education, develop some style, and then wait at the back of the line to try and come up with an intelligent comment. So far, you have failed miserably.

Children at risk? At risk of what? Ending up on Tennyson or A St. and/or getting killed in Palma Ceia?

Every article, even the ones from the right-wing press, admit that many of these children would be in danger of losing their lives if they were forced to return home.

Words on our Statue of Liberty:

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free;
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless,
Tempest-tossed to me
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

This is what America is all about.

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

What articles? What articles say these Illegal Alien Urchins will lose their life if sent back? The GOP needs to be the Party of Law and Order. Sending these ignorant criminals back to where they came will help them win in 2016 and beyond. Don't make me laugh that it will cost them. These Illegals won't vote GOP because they, like the Jews, Italians, and Irish of 100 years ago want WELFARE. The Welfare State was created in the 1930's by the children of the Jew, Italians and Irish. Catholics and Jews like WELFARE and FREEBIES

As the author of 8:42 PM, I say that 6:41 PM is a miserable, outright xenophobic and anti-Semitic Creten. How dare you disparage across the ethnic spectrum.

The issue is LEGAL immigration to America for ALL peoples. Nothing more.

Someone such as you who has your head up your ass--one in the same--gives a rotten name to all the other poor assholes in the world.

All you people saying that my people got here legally need to take a serious look at your history. And while you are at it, consider if your family had a hand in some of the worst injustices here (internment, stealing land from natives, slavery, etc. etc.). No civilized country rejects child refugees at risk.

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

And then there is the way the GOP moved last week to marginalize themselves with Hispanic voters. Today Hispanics represent 16% of ordinary Americans. By 2050 they will represent 30%. No matter. Not only did the House GOP leadership refuse to bring a popular immigration reform measure to a vote that was passed by a large bi-partisan majority in the Senate. But last Friday, the Republicans also passed a bill to eliminate the Dreamer program that was established by the President to defer the deportation of children brought to America as minors who have known no other country except the USA.

Most Hispanic Americans do not think of these questions as "policy debates." They take them very personally. They believe that Republicans are not on their side, and that they don't respect their community. And when Hispanic Americans see the vitriol directed by the right wing extremists at buses containing Central American children, they know for a fact that the GOP is opposing immigration reform because much of their base simply does not like Hispanics.

If anyone had remained unconvinced that was true, the vote on the Dreamer program sealed the deal. To find something to address the children border crisis that would pass with the support of their caucus, the GOP leadership had to keep making their bill meaner and meaner until they satisfied their most extremist members.

It is likely that this vote will be a watershed moment similar to former GOP California Governor Pete Wilson's support of Prop 187 in the 1990's that turned formerly purple California into a bright blue state. Between 1960 and 1988 California voted for the Republican Presidential nominee in six of seven elections. It has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1992.

You're a really odd fellow. I suppose that your bottom line is winning elections--at all costs. Fine for you. Obviously, you make your living as a consultant, operative or some other flak. I suppose it's a living.

As a Democrat, I vote based on rule of law. Period. I'm sure I'm in an extreme minority. That's fine, too. I have to vote based on principles, not simply what or who is 'sexy' or in vogue at a particular moment in time. I think you do a disservice to Hispanics by lumping them all together and suggesting that their motivation is amnesty for 'their brethren.' But even if that were true, it's still catering to breaking the law to curry political favor. Again, I will never go down that road. Ever.

I was taught respect for the law and fairness for all, regardless of race, gender, orientation, etc. et al. Neither me nor my family would ever think of subverting the law to curry political favor and win elections. Naive you might say, but without principles and rule of law our society is nothing.

If this is what the Democratic party is going to be all about, then they will lose the last of the honest, principled voters who believed in stalwarts such as FDR, the Kennedys, and even Bill Clinton, and cater exclusively to a radical, extreme-left fringe.

If you really had respect for the law you would support the 2008 law that George Bush signed. What a hypocrite!

The law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Do we really want to repeal that commitment the moment it becomes inconvenient?

It's NOT a loophole no matter how many times you quote Tea Party talking points. It's the law signed by Bush in 2008. YOU don't get to pick and choose which laws to enforce anon 1:42. These children are protected by International and US law.

We have to say it again because you are a simpleton who can neither read nor comprehend. The LOOPHOLE will be closed, whether you like it or not. The illegals must be treated no differently than those from Canada nor Mexico. Simply tuning out doesn't change this. Please try to learn the fact that YOU can't pick and choose which laws you like. For the seven millionth time, WE DON'T DO OPEN BORDERS!

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

You are such a racist we have to say it again. It was a law signed by George Bush in 2008 that had bipartisan support. It was not a loophole, all parties knew precisely what it would do. The law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Most of us do not want to repeal that commitment, except for the extreme right.

This isn't an immigration problem, said the New York Times-it's a refugee crisis. Drug gangs now rule the streets of Central American countries, killing or sexually abusing kids who refuse to join their criminal enterprises. Honduras is now the murder capitol of the world. In El Salvador, murders of kids have soared 77% in a year.

Republicans, and the 9:28 poster, who would gut the 2008 anti-trafficking law, a bipartisan bill that was signed by George W. Bush, are showing appalling blindness to a humanitarian tragedy!

For the benefit of those who believe in good, conservative American values and the rule of law:

We have to say it again because you are a simpleton who can neither read nor comprehend. The LOOPHOLE will be closed, whether you like it or not. The illegals must be treated no differently than those from Canada nor Mexico. Simply tuning out doesn't change this. Please try to learn the fact that YOU can't pick and choose which laws you like. For the seven millionth time, WE DON'T DO OPEN BORDERS!

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

Cornyn-Cuellar bipartisan legislation will end up closing the loophole, though it won't happen until after the Nov. election when the Democrats get cut off at the dick.

These are the good American values that you, a bigot, are forgetting. Words on our Statue of Liberty:

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free;
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless,
Tempest-tossed to me
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

This is what America is all about. It's not about sending children back to be raped or killed.

You need to do a lot more reading 4:53 and 4:55 (same person) about why these children are here and stop spewing Tea Party hatred and extreme right-wing venom. Many will be killed if they return. This is fact not fiction.

They are children. Thousands of them, many under 12 years old. They are coming from the violent and gang ridden countries of South America.

The facts are they claim to be refugees and they are protected by International and U.S. laws. Every one must receive due process to see if they have legitimate claims.

It's no loophole, it's our own law signed by George Bush in 2008. The law was supposed to ensure that children fleeing persecution or trafficking or other severe abuse were not returned to grave danger. That's not the problem. The problem is too few immigration judges to handle the backlog of cases, including the latest flood of children. Blame that on the Republicans.

We are a nation of laws and YOU don't get to pick and choose which ones to adhere to. I do hope you will do more reading on this instead of quoting Fox news. Surely, our nation will meet this crisis in a manner befitting our history. Extreme right wing radio and talk show hosts aren't experts even though Tea Party people would want them to be.

How many children killed is acceptable to you? Your lack of education on this subject is remarkably underwhelming!

By the way, the prophetic words you reference were penned by the poet Emma Goldman, herself a LEGAL immigrant. You really need to both learn history, rule of law, and become educated before you cast aspersions. Please don't corrupt Emma's words which referenced LEGAL immigrants and confuse with illegals to try and make a case. You fail miserably and fall flat on you ass doing so.

We're sure that is asking way too much from you, bitch.


For the benefit of those who believe in good, conservative American values and the rule of law we are forced to repeatedly post:

We have to say it again because you are a simpleton who can neither read nor comprehend. The LOOPHOLE will be closed, whether you like it or not. The illegals must be treated no differently than those from Canada nor Mexico. Simply tuning out doesn't change this. Please try to learn the fact that YOU can't pick and choose which laws you like. For the seven millionth time, WE DON'T DO OPEN BORDERS!

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

You need to do a lot more reading about why these children are here and stop spewing Tea Party hatred and extreme right-wing venom. Many will be killed if they return. This is fact not fiction.

They are children. Thousands of them, many under 12 years old. They are coming from the violent and gang ridden countries of South America.

The FACTS are they claim to be REFUGES and they are protected by International and U.S. laws. Every one must receive due process to see if they have legitimate claims.

It's NO loophole, it's our own BIPARTISAN law signed by George Bush in 2008. The law was supposed to ensure that children fleeing persecution or trafficking or other severe abuse were not returned to grave danger. That's not the problem. The problem is too few immigration judges to handle the backlog of cases, including the latest flood of children. Blame that on the Republicans.

We are a nation of laws and YOU don't get to pick and choose which ones to adhere to. I do hope you will do more reading on this instead of quoting Fox news. Surely, our nation will meet this crisis in a manner befitting our history. Extreme right wing radio and talk show hosts aren't experts even though Tea Party people would want them to be.

How many children killed is acceptable to you? Your lack of education on this subject is remarkably underwhelming!

This isn't an immigration problem, said the New York Times-it's a refugee crisis. Drug gangs now rule the streets of Central American countries, killing or sexually abusing kids who refuse to join their criminal enterprises. Honduras is now the murder capitol of the world. In El Salvador, murders of kids have soared 77% in a year.

Republicans, and the 8:46 poster, who would gut the 2008 anti-trafficking law, a bipartisan bill that was signed by George W. Bush, are showing appalling blindness to a humanitarian tragedy!

By the way, the prophetic words you reference were penned by the poet Emma Goldman, herself a LEGAL immigrant. You really need to both learn history, rule of law, and become educated before you cast aspersions. Please don't corrupt Emma's words which referenced LEGAL immigrants and confuse with illegals to try and make a case. You fail miserably and fall flat on you ass doing so.

We're sure that is asking way too much from you, bitch.


For the benefit of those who believe in good, conservative American values and the rule of law we are forced to repeatedly post:

We have to say it again because you are a simpleton who can neither read nor comprehend. The LOOPHOLE will be closed, whether you like it or not. The illegals must be treated no differently than those from Canada nor Mexico. Simply tuning out doesn't change this. Please try to learn the fact that YOU can't pick and choose which laws you like. For the seven millionth time, WE DON'T DO OPEN BORDERS!

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

As Duke Wayne said, "Round 'em up and send 'em back!"

As Elvis sang, "Return to sender!"

Hey, they got it. Why can't you, bitch?

You need to do a lot more reading about why these children are here and stop spewing Tea Party hatred and extreme right-wing venom. Many will be killed if they return. This is fact not fiction.

They are children. Thousands of them, many under 12 years old. They are coming from the violent and gang ridden countries of South America.

The FACTS are they claim to be REFUGES and they are protected by International and U.S. laws. Every one must receive due process to see if they have legitimate claims.

It's NO loophole, it's our own BIPARTISAN law signed by George Bush in 2008. The law was supposed to ensure that children fleeing persecution or trafficking or other severe abuse were not returned to grave danger. That's not the problem. The problem is too few immigration judges to handle the backlog of cases, including the latest flood of children. Blame that on the Republicans.

We are a nation of laws and YOU don't get to pick and choose which ones to adhere to. I do hope you will do more reading on this instead of quoting Fox news. Surely, our nation will meet this crisis in a manner befitting our history. Extreme right wing radio and talk show hosts aren't experts even though Tea Party people would want them to be.

How many children killed is acceptable to you? Your lack of education on this subject is remarkably underwhelming!

This isn't an immigration problem, said the New York Times-it's a refugee crisis. Drug gangs now rule the streets of Central American countries, killing or sexually abusing kids who refuse to join their criminal enterprises. Honduras is now the murder capitol of the world. In El Salvador, murders of kids have soared 77% in a year.

Republicans, and the 1:36 poster, who would gut the 2008 anti-trafficking law, a bipartisan bill that was signed by George W. Bush, are showing appalling blindness to a humanitarian tragedy!

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Our favorite line from Dickens 'A Christmas Carol': "...then they had better do so, and thereby HELP TO DECREASE THE SURPLUS POPULATION!"

You are such a racist we have to say it again. It was a law signed by George Bush in 2008 that had bipartisan support. It was not a loophole, all parties knew precisely what it would do. The law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Most of us do not want to repeal that commitment, except for the extreme right.

And the above statements by the same person at 4:27 and 4:32 is why Tea Party Republicans will keep losing elections.

The conservative extremes have assured me they will never be able to elect another president through the end of this century. Thank you for assuring Democratic victory in 2016 and beyond. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot and destroying your Republican party.

Sorry, bitch, but there is nothing 'racist' in this truth. That's where you ultra-left whores go when you can't win an argument, tell the truth or persuade others. As the man said, 'Cornyn-Cuellar or a later version thereof is coming, whether you fucking like it or not!'

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

We can tell when you are losing an argument-----you swear and use sexist terms. You have serious anger issues bro!

The conservative editorial board of The Wall Street Journal reamed into congressional Republicans in an editorial published in Saturday's paper, after the House passed a bill Friday night that effectively would put the status of nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants in limbo.

House Republicans passed legislation Friday night to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program established unilaterally by President Barack Obama in 2012. The program shields hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation.

The WSJ editorial board wrote, however, that the adding on of the DACA legislation to the package only provided " another spectacle of internal disarray" on what should be a path to a Senate majority in November.

From the editorial:

"The bill should have been a moment to redirect attention to President Obama's cynical handling of the border problem and to the Democratic Party's immigration divisions. Instead the GOP again gave the country the impression that its highest policy priority is to deport as many children as rapidly as possible back from wherever they came. [...]

The GOP's Deportation Caucus—led by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions and Ted Cruz of Texas—lobbied House conservatives to resist any immigration compromise and pick a fight with Mr. Boehner. The dissenters demanded an array of policy changes, most notably new restrictions on the President's executive order allowing some undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children to remain in the country.

Readers may recall that the last Republican in an election year to support deporting immigrant children brought here through no fault of their own was Mitt Romney. A splendid voter attraction that was."

Your 'WE SUPPORT OPEN BORDERS!' folly is what lost both you and your specious battle cry the Republic. Americans don't buy that crap; not now; never. As for the use of profanity, I was always taught to call a spade a spade; an asshole an asshole; and yes, a fucking ignoramus such as yourself a fucking ignoramus. No apologies here, bitch. Nice to see that you had your whore ass kicked to the curb and had to drop the 'racist' bellwether when we called you to the mat on it and you ended up pulling back with your tail between your legs. You might, just might, be starting to learn your lesson, bitch.

But we digress, and it is back to reality for what really matters:

Sorry, bitch, but there is nothing 'racist' in this truth. That's where you ultra-left whores go when you can't win an argument, tell the truth or persuade others. As the man said, 'Cornyn-Cuellar or a later version thereof is coming, whether you fucking like it or not!'

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way

By the way, the prophetic words you reference were penned by the poet Emma Goldman, herself a LEGAL immigrant. You really need to both learn history, rule of law, and become educated before you cast aspersions. Please don't corrupt Emma's words which referenced LEGAL immigrants and confuse with illegals to try and make a case. You fail miserably and fall flat on you ass doing so.

We're sure that is asking way too much from you, bitch.


For the benefit of those who believe in good, conservative American values and the rule of law we are forced to repeatedly post:

We have to say it again because you are a simpleton who can neither read nor comprehend. The LOOPHOLE will be closed, whether you like it or not. The illegals must be treated no differently than those from Canada nor Mexico. Simply tuning out doesn't change this. Please try to learn the fact that YOU can't pick and choose which laws you like. For the seven millionth time, WE DON'T DO OPEN BORDERS!

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

We need to bring everyone back to this article's point:

Son, or daughter. We'll just stick with the eponymous bitch:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

This isn't an immigration problem, said the New York Times-it's a refugee crisis. Drug gangs now rule the streets of Central American countries, killing or sexually abusing kids who refuse to join their criminal enterprises. Honduras is now the murder capitol of the world. In El Salvador, murders of kids have soared 77% in a year.

Republicans, and the extreme conservative poster, who would gut the 2008 anti-trafficking law, a bipartisan bill that was signed by George W. Bush, are showing appalling blindness to a humanitarian tragedy!

We can tell when Tea Party extremes are losing an argument-----you swear and use sexist and racist terms. You have serious anger issues brother!

The conservative editorial board of The Wall Street Journal reamed into congressional Republicans in an editorial published in Saturday's paper, after the House passed a bill Friday night that effectively would put the status of nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants in limbo.

House Republicans passed legislation Friday night to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program established unilaterally by President Barack Obama in 2012. The program shields hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation.

The WSJ editorial board wrote, however, that the adding on of the DACA legislation to the package only provided " another spectacle of internal disarray" on what should be a path to a Senate majority in November.

From the editorial:

"The bill should have been a moment to redirect attention to President Obama's cynical handling of the border problem and to the Democratic Party's immigration divisions. Instead the GOP again gave the country the impression that its highest policy priority is to deport as many children as rapidly as possible back from wherever they came. [...]

The GOP's Deportation Caucus—led by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions and Ted Cruz of Texas—lobbied House conservatives to resist any immigration compromise and pick a fight with Mr. Boehner. The dissenters demanded an array of policy changes, most notably new restrictions on the President's executive order allowing some undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children to remain in the country.

Readers may recall that the last Republican in an election year to support deporting immigrant children brought here through no fault of their own was Mitt Romney. A splendid voter attraction that was."

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

If you really had respect for the law you would support the 2008 law that George Bush signed. What a hypocrite!

The BIPARTISAN law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Do we really want to repeal that commitment the moment it becomes inconvenient?

They are children. Thousands of them, most under 12 and some as young as 5 years old. They are coming from the violent and gang ridden countries of South America. We will not send them back to be killed.

The facts are they claim to be refugees, deserve their hearing before a judge, and they are protected by International and U.S. laws. Every one must receive due process to see if they have legitimate claims. Blame the Republicans for not having enough judges to do this speedily. They are the party of NO.

People saying that my people got here legally need to take a serious look at your history. And while you are at it, consider if your family had a hand in some of the worst injustices here (internment, stealing land from natives, slavery, etc. etc.). No civilized country rejects child refugees at risk.

Your 'WE SUPPORT OPEN BORDERS!' folly is what lost both you and your specious battle cry the Republic. Americans don't buy that crap; not now; never. As for the use of profanity, I was always taught to call a spade a spade; an asshole an asshole; and yes, a fucking ignoramus such as yourself a fucking ignoramus. No apologies here, bitch. Nice to see that you had your whore ass kicked to the curb and had to drop the 'racist' bellwether when we called you to the mat on it and you ended up pulling back with your tail between your legs. You might, just might, be starting to learn your lesson, bitch.

But we digress, and it is back to reality for what really matters:

Sorry, bitch, but there is nothing 'racist' in this truth. That's where you ultra-left whores go when you can't win an argument, tell the truth or persuade others. As the man said, 'Cornyn-Cuellar or a later version thereof is coming, whether you fucking like it or not!'

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way

By the way, the prophetic words you reference were penned by the poet Emma Goldman, herself a LEGAL immigrant. You really need to both learn history, rule of law, and become educated before you cast aspersions. Please don't corrupt Emma's words which referenced LEGAL immigrants and confuse with illegals to try and make a case. You fail miserably and fall flat on you ass doing so.

We're sure that is asking way too much from you, bitch.


For the benefit of those who believe in good, conservative American values and the rule of law we are forced to repeatedly post:

We have to say it again because you are a simpleton who can neither read nor comprehend. The LOOPHOLE will be closed, whether you like it or not. The illegals must be treated no differently than those from Canada nor Mexico. Simply tuning out doesn't change this. Please try to learn the fact that YOU can't pick and choose which laws you like. For the seven millionth time, WE DON'T DO OPEN BORDERS!

They are neither 'refugees' nor 'at risk.' If so, then answer a very simple question with only one obvious answer: Why not trek south into South America or north and STOP in Mexico or another Latin American country?

The only answer is that the illegals want Los Estados Unidos and no other place will suit them. That is because this is the 'wealthy land,' where $$$$ is the motivation for pushing through other Latin American countries AND Mexico.

Oh, and while you're compiling your list of all the inhumanities man has wrought on his fellow man, and you are right, I'm not making light of it at all, then please ALSO include the injustices on the other continents: Asia, South America, Europe, Australia, Africa, and the rest of North America. Let's get it right all at once, shall we?

Please use your bull shit on someone else. We don't buy that crap. Economics, pure, plain, and oh so simple!

We need to bring everyone back to this article's point:

Son, or daughter. We'll just stick with the eponymous bitch:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Peddle your ultra liberal shit someplace else, bitch. America ain't buying it.

Calling a spade a spade, ho!

We can tell when Tea Party extremes are losing an argument-----you swear and use sexist and racist terms. You have serious anger issues brother!

The conservative editorial board of The Wall Street Journal reamed into congressional Republicans in an editorial published in Saturday's paper, after the House passed a bill Friday night that effectively would put the status of nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants in limbo.

House Republicans passed legislation Friday night to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program established unilaterally by President Barack Obama in 2012. The program shields hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation.

The WSJ editorial board wrote, however, that the adding on of the DACA legislation to the package only provided " another spectacle of internal disarray" on what should be a path to a Senate majority in November.

From the editorial:

"The bill should have been a moment to redirect attention to President Obama's cynical handling of the border problem and to the Democratic Party's immigration divisions. Instead the GOP again gave the country the impression that its highest policy priority is to deport as many children as rapidly as possible back from wherever they came. [...]

The GOP's Deportation Caucus—led by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions and Ted Cruz of Texas—lobbied House conservatives to resist any immigration compromise and pick a fight with Mr. Boehner. The dissenters demanded an array of policy changes, most notably new restrictions on the President's executive order allowing some undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children to remain in the country.

Readers may recall that the last Republican in an election year to support deporting immigrant children brought here through no fault of their own was Mitt Romney. A splendid voter attraction that was."

This isn't an immigration problem, said the New York Times-it's a refugee crisis. Drug gangs now rule the streets of Central American countries, killing or sexually abusing kids who refuse to join their criminal enterprises. Honduras is now the murder capitol of the world. In El Salvador, murders of kids have soared 77% in a year.

Republicans, and the extreme conservative poster, who would gut the 2008 anti-trafficking law, a bipartisan bill that was signed by George W. Bush, are showing appalling blindness to a humanitarian tragedy!

Your 'WE SUPPORT OPEN BORDERS!' folly is what lost both you and your specious battle cry the Republic. Americans don't buy that crap; not now; never. As for the use of profanity, I was always taught to call a spade a spade; an asshole an asshole; and yes, a fucking ignoramus such as yourself a fucking ignoramus. No apologies here, bitch. Nice to see that you had your whore ass kicked to the curb and had to drop the 'racist' bellwether when we called you to the mat on it and you ended up pulling back with your tail between your legs. You might, just might, be starting to learn your lesson, bitch.

But we digress, and it is back to reality for what really matters:

Sorry, bitch, but there is nothing 'racist' in this truth. That's where you ultra-left whores go when you can't win an argument, tell the truth or persuade others. As the man said, 'Cornyn-Cuellar or a later version thereof is coming, whether you fucking like it or not!'

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way

We need to bring everyone back to this article's point:

Son, or daughter. We'll just stick with the eponymous bitch:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

Peddle your ultra liberal shit someplace else, bitch. America ain't buying it.

Calling a spade a spade, ho!

We can tell when Tea Party extremes are losing an argument-----you swear and use sexist and racist terms. You have serious anger issues brother!

The conservative editorial board of The Wall Street Journal reamed into congressional Republicans in an editorial published in Saturday's paper, after the House passed a bill Friday night that effectively would put the status of nearly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants in limbo.

House Republicans passed legislation Friday night to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program established unilaterally by President Barack Obama in 2012. The program shields hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children from deportation.

The WSJ editorial board wrote, however, that the adding on of the DACA legislation to the package only provided " another spectacle of internal disarray" on what should be a path to a Senate majority in November.

From the editorial:

"The bill should have been a moment to redirect attention to President Obama's cynical handling of the border problem and to the Democratic Party's immigration divisions. Instead the GOP again gave the country the impression that its highest policy priority is to deport as many children as rapidly as possible back from wherever they came. [...]

The GOP's Deportation Caucus—led by Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions and Ted Cruz of Texas—lobbied House conservatives to resist any immigration compromise and pick a fight with Mr. Boehner. The dissenters demanded an array of policy changes, most notably new restrictions on the President's executive order allowing some undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children to remain in the country.

Readers may recall that the last Republican in an election year to support deporting immigrant children brought here through no fault of their own was Mitt Romney. A splendid voter attraction that was."

If you really had respect for the law you would support the 2008 law that George Bush signed. What a hypocrite!

The BIPARTISAN law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Do we really want to repeal that commitment the moment it becomes inconvenient?

You are such a racist we have to say it again. It was a law signed by George Bush in 2008 that had bipartisan support. It was not a loophole, all parties knew precisely what it would do. The law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Most of us do not want to repeal that commitment, except for the extreme right.

Your 'WE SUPPORT OPEN BORDERS!' folly is what lost both you and your specious battle cry the Republic. Americans don't buy that crap; not now; never. As for the use of profanity, I was always taught to call a spade a spade; an asshole an asshole; and yes, a fucking ignoramus such as yourself a fucking ignoramus. No apologies here, bitch. Nice to see that you had your whore ass kicked to the curb and had to drop the 'racist' bellwether when we called you to the mat on it and you ended up pulling back with your tail between your legs. You might, just might, be starting to learn your lesson, bitch.

But we digress, and it is back to reality for what really matters:

Sorry, bitch, but there is nothing 'racist' in this truth. That's where you ultra-left whores go when you can't win an argument, tell the truth or persuade others. As the man said, 'Cornyn-Cuellar or a later version thereof is coming, whether you fucking like it or not!'

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way

We need to bring everyone back to this article's point:

Son, or daughter. We'll just stick with the eponymous bitch:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

To the sexist racist of the last two posts: The latest poll shows how the majority of Americans view the subject:

The results of a Reuters/Ipsos poll highlight the complexity of the child migrant issue for Obama, who has sought to emphasize his compassion while also insisting that his administration plans to send home most of the children, many of whom have fled violence in their homelands.

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. racist and sexist conservative extremist, or get out of the way! America has spoken!!!

Little dick, your ranting, raving and name-calling won't score you points with anyone. In fact, you have lost. Time now for you to crawl back under your rock and go to the Shades forever.

Class is back in session:

We need to bring everyone back to this article's point:

Son, or daughter. We'll just stick with the eponymous bitch:

Since you continue to have your head up your ass, bitch, we repeat. Pay close attention as school is now in session:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way!

It seems like anon 1:11 has a problem with the American people who seem to favor the refugee children and the points 10:53 and others were making. Most seem to be in favor of a hearing and the 2008 bipartisan law that treats them like refugees.

I know I agree with the poll that children should not be sent back to danger and I'm glad most Americans feel that way. It's America, Love it or Leave it !

We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Well 4:28 you are in the minority, so if you don't like our country and our laws........well, you leave it. The majority of Americans have spoken and they don't want to send children back to be raped or killed.

The 2008 law was no loophole. They knew what was in it and it was BIPARTISAN legislation signed by a Republican President. The law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Most of us do not want to repeal that commitment, except for the extreme right.

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY and you know it if the sexist troll for the Tea Party can read. The latest poll shows how the majority of Americans view the subject:

The results of a Reuters/Ipsos poll highlight the complexity of the child migrant issue for Obama, who has sought to emphasize his compassion while also insisting that his administration plans to send home most of the children, many of whom have fled violence in their homelands.

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Blowing more wind, bitch. After Nov., the Deport-the-Illegals Express will be running in reverse, ahora mismo! Andole, even!

You've lost, politically, morally, and effectively. Ball game is over.

Your 'WE SUPPORT OPEN BORDERS!' folly is what lost both you and your specious battle cry the Republic. Americans don't buy that crap; not now; never. As for the use of profanity, I was always taught to call a spade a spade; an asshole an asshole; and yes, a fucking ignoramus such as yourself a fucking ignoramus. No apologies here, bitch. Nice to see that you had your whore ass kicked to the curb and had to drop the 'racist' bellwether when we called you to the mat on it and you ended up pulling back with your tail between your legs. You might, just might, be starting to learn your lesson, bitch.

But we digress, and it is back to reality for what really matters:

Sorry, bitch, but there is nothing 'racist' in this truth. That's where you ultra-left whores go when you can't win an argument, tell the truth or persuade others. As the man said, 'Cornyn-Cuellar or a later version thereof is coming, whether you fucking like it or not!'

Times are tough all over, including in continental Africa, Asia, and elsewhere. That's life, bitch. We can't be all things to all people. They have to get it right in their own countries, and if they either can't or choose not to, THAT'S LIFE!

We repeat until it sinks into your simpleton, pea-sized brain:

Bitch needs to get on board with bipartisan Cornyn-Cuellar legislation which will close the loophole and treat illegals the same as from Canada and Mexico.

Get on board, Barbie, or get the hell out of the way

Well 8:44 you are in the minority, so if you don't like our country and our laws........well, you leave it. The majority of Americans have spoken and they don't want to send children back to be raped or killed.

The 2008 law does NOT support OPEN borders and was NO loophole. They knew what was in it and it was BIPARTISAN legislation signed by a Republican President. The law was passed to protect innocent children from the horrors of war and gang violence. Most of us do not want to repeal that commitment, except for the extreme right.

Anon 8:44,

You need to do a lot more reading about why these children are here and stop spewing Tea Party hatred and extreme right-wing venom. Many will be killed/raped if they return. This is fact not fiction.

They are children. Thousands of them, many under 12 years old. They are coming from the violent and gang ridden countries of South America.

The facts are they claim to be refugees and they are protected by International and U.S. laws. Every one must receive due process to see if they have legitimate claims.

It's no loophole, it's our own law signed by George Bush in 2008. The law was supposed to ensure that children fleeing persecution or trafficking or other severe abuse were not returned to grave danger. That's not the problem. The problem is too few immigration judges to handle the backlog of cases, including the latest flood of children. Blame that on the Republicans.

We are a nation of laws and YOU don't get to pick and choose which ones to adhere to. I do hope you will do more reading on this instead of quoting Fox news. Surely, our nation will meet this crisis in a manner befitting our history. Extreme right wing radio and talk show hosts aren't experts even though Tea Party people, and you, would want them to be.

How many children killed or raped is acceptable to you? Your lack of education on this subject is remarkably underwhelming!

Game is over for you even if YOU don't believe in American laws, all the recent polls, all the conservative newspaper editorials, etc. Get out of the way Mr. anarchist!

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

And then there is the way the GOP moved to marginalize themselves with Hispanic voters. Today Hispanics represent 16% of ordinary Americans. By 2050 they will represent 30%. No matter. Not only did the House GOP leadership refuse to bring a popular immigration reform measure to a vote that was passed by a large bi-partisan majority in the Senate. But last Friday, the Republicans also passed a bill to eliminate the Dreamer program that was established by the President to defer the deportation of children brought to America as minors who have known no other country except the USA.

Most Hispanic Americans do not think of these questions as "policy debates." They take them very personally. They believe that Republicans are not on their side, and that they don't respect their community. And when Hispanic Americans see the vitriol directed by the right wing extremists at buses containing Central American children, they know for a fact that the GOP is opposing immigration reform because much of their base simply does not like Hispanics.

If anyone had remained unconvinced that was true, the vote on the Dreamer program sealed the deal. To find something to address the children border crisis that would pass with the support of their caucus, the GOP leadership had to keep making their bill meaner and meaner until they satisfied their most extremist members.

It is likely that this vote will be a watershed moment similar to former GOP California Governor Pete Wilson's support of Prop 187 in the 1990's that turned formerly purple California into a bright blue state. Between 1960 and 1988 California voted for the Republican Presidential nominee in six of seven elections. It has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1992.

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

By MW:

Such leading members of the Demobstercratic Party as Barbara Lee are pretending that they are motivated by humanitarian concerns in the positions they have taken in regard to aiding, helping, and assisting. and quite likely also permanently settling in our country, the huge numbers of undocumented aliens who recently have been entering the US.

However, and just like virtually every position that the leadership of the DNC has taken for at last several decades, in other words going back to at least the1920's, the phonies, con men, and scam artists who comprise the overwhelming majority of the leadership of the DNC, and including in their latest desperate attempt to increase illegal immigration, are actually motivated by a desire to win elections, and including since they are well aware that people who are poor, uneducated, on welfare, or recent immigrants almost always vote for the DP, and while the overwhelming majority of people who are intelligent,. educated, employed, NOT on welfare, and even slightly successful overwhelming vote Republican

But the DP is in serious trouble. In other words, in recent decades more and more people have caught on to the fact that the DP is the party of lies, garbage, nonsense, stupidity, street crime, idiocy, destroyed schools and neighborhoods, crooked lawyers, and social programs that do not work.

So most likely based on recent trends, the DP would be looking at big losses in the soon November 2014 elections, and quite likely even many times drastically larger losses two years from now in the November 2016 elections.

So as to avoid being quite likely almost totally destroyed and virtually voted out of existence in November 2016, the Demobstercratic Party therefore needs to get in still higher gear with more and more and ever increasing welfare programs, making massive vote fraud still easier, and increasing illegal immigration.

So that is the real reason that Barbara Lee, Obama, and various other members of the leadership of the DP are in favor of increasing illegal immigration.

Note-----the Democrats will lose the 2016 election if they let the extreme left whores of the party dictate their policies. They will lose moderate Democrats such as me, who will cross party lines to vote the way Reagan Democrats did three decades ago.

That's not fantasy; it's reality.

Just how big an ignoramus are you. It's the Republicans that are in the way and to blame for failing to fix problems at the border. They have refused to provide the necessary resources to deal with what they call a serious problem because the Tea Party Republicans are acting like children and need to grow up. Calling on you to grow up and start acting like an adult also.

The bill you cite has no chance because the Republicans can't get out of their own way. In the meantime the laws of our country say the refugees must have their day in court to determine if these children can be sent back safely. We are a nation of laws and you don't get to choose which ones to obey for the rest of us or for our nation.

This poll and all the others taken show why you are very wrong. I know you would like to deny the results, but this is realty!

The results of a Reuters/Ipsos poll highlight the complexity of the child migrant issue for Obama, who has sought to emphasize his compassion while also insisting that his administration plans to send home most of the children, many of whom have fled violence in their homelands.

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken, and all the polls show you lose!

By MW:

Such leading members of the Demobstercratic Party as Barbara Lee are pretending that they are motivated by humanitarian concerns in the positions they have taken in regard to aiding, helping, and assisting. and quite likely also permanently settling in our country, the huge numbers of undocumented aliens who recently have been entering the US.

However, and just like virtually every position that the leadership of the DNC has taken for at last several decades, in other words going back to at least the1920's, the phonies, con men, and scam artists who comprise the overwhelming majority of the leadership of the DNC, and including in their latest desperate attempt to increase illegal immigration, are actually motivated by a desire to win elections, and including since they are well aware that people who are poor, uneducated, on welfare, or recent immigrants almost always vote for the DP, and while the overwhelming majority of people who are intelligent,. educated, employed, NOT on welfare, and even slightly successful overwhelming vote Republican

But the DP is in serious trouble. In other words, in recent decades more and more people have caught on to the fact that the DP is the party of lies, garbage, nonsense, stupidity, street crime, idiocy, destroyed schools and neighborhoods, crooked lawyers, and social programs that do not work.

So most likely based on recent trends, the DP would be looking at big losses in the soon November 2014 elections, and quite likely even many times drastically larger losses two years from now in the November 2016 elections.

So as to avoid being quite likely almost totally destroyed and virtually voted out of existence in November 2016, the Demobstercratic Party therefore needs to get in still higher gear with more and more and ever increasing welfare programs, making massive vote fraud still easier, and increasing illegal immigration.

So that is the real reason that Barbara Lee, Obama, and various other members of the leadership of the DP are in favor of increasing illegal immigration.

We now return you to reality:

Note-----the Democrats will lose the 2016 election if they let the extreme left whores of the party dictate their policies. They will lose moderate Democrats such as me, who will cross party lines to vote the way Reagan Democrats did three decades ago.

That's not fantasy; it's history, and reality, bitch.

We now return you to reality!

Just how big an ignoramus are you. It's the Republicans that are in the way and to blame for failing to fix problems at the border. They have refused to provide the necessary resources to deal with what they call a serious problem because the Tea Party Republicans are acting like children and need to grow up. Calling on you to grow up and start acting like an adult also.

The bill you cite has no chance because the Republicans can't get out of their own way. In the meantime the laws of our country say the refugees must have their day in court to determine if these children can be sent back safely. We are a nation of laws and you don't get to choose which ones to obey for the rest of us or for our nation.

This poll and all the others taken show why you are very wrong. I know you would like to deny the results, but this is realty!

The results of a Reuters/Ipsos poll highlight the complexity of the child migrant issue for Obama, who has sought to emphasize his compassion while also insisting that his administration plans to send home most of the children, many of whom have fled violence in their homelands.

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken, and all the polls show you lose!

We now return you to reality:

Note-----the Democrats will lose the 2016 election if they let the extreme left whores of the party dictate their policies. They will lose moderate Democrats such as me, who will cross party lines to vote the way Reagan Democrats did three decades ago.

That's not fantasy; it's history, and reality, bitch.

Singing the new national anthem of the US:

'Return to sender!'

I don't even like Elvis.

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

More Realty and History:

And then there is the way the GOP moved to marginalize themselves with Hispanic voters. Today Hispanics represent 16% of ordinary Americans. By 2050 they will represent 30%. No matter. Not only did the House GOP leadership refuse to bring a popular immigration reform measure to a vote that was passed by a large bi-partisan majority in the Senate. But last Friday, the Republicans also passed a bill to eliminate the Dreamer program that was established by the President to defer the deportation of children brought to America as minors who have known no other country except the USA.

Most Hispanic Americans do not think of these questions as "policy debates." They take them very personally. They believe that Republicans are not on their side, and that they don't respect their community. And when Hispanic Americans see the vitriol directed by the right wing extremists at buses containing Central American children, they know for a fact that the GOP is opposing immigration reform because much of their base simply does not like Hispanics.

If anyone had remained unconvinced that was true, the vote on the Dreamer program sealed the deal. To find something to address the children border crisis that would pass with the support of their caucus, the GOP leadership had to keep making their bill meaner and meaner until they satisfied their most extremist members.

It is likely that this vote will be a watershed moment similar to former GOP California Governor Pete Wilson's support of Prop 187 in the 1990's that turned formerly purple California into a bright blue state. Between 1960 and 1988 California voted for the Republican Presidential nominee in six of seven elections. It has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1992.

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

We now return you to reality:

Note-----the Democrats will lose the 2016 election if they let the extreme left whores of the party dictate their policies. They will lose moderate Democrats such as me, who will cross party lines to vote the way Reagan Democrats did three decades ago.

That's not fantasy; it's history, and reality, bitch.

By MW:

Such leading members of the Demobstercratic Party as Barbara Lee are pretending that they are motivated by humanitarian concerns in the positions they have taken in regard to aiding, helping, and assisting. and quite likely also permanently settling in our country, the huge numbers of undocumented aliens who recently have been entering the US.

However, and just like virtually every position that the leadership of the DNC has taken for at last several decades, in other words going back to at least the1920's, the phonies, con men, and scam artists who comprise the overwhelming majority of the leadership of the DNC, and including in their latest desperate attempt to increase illegal immigration, are actually motivated by a desire to win elections, and including since they are well aware that people who are poor, uneducated, on welfare, or recent immigrants almost always vote for the DP, and while the overwhelming majority of people who are intelligent,. educated, employed, NOT on welfare, and even slightly successful overwhelming vote Republican

But the DP is in serious trouble. In other words, in recent decades more and more people have caught on to the fact that the DP is the party of lies, garbage, nonsense, stupidity, street crime, idiocy, destroyed schools and neighborhoods, crooked lawyers, and social programs that do not work.

So most likely based on recent trends, the DP would be looking at big losses in the soon November 2014 elections, and quite likely even many times drastically larger losses two years from now in the November 2016 elections.

So as to avoid being quite likely almost totally destroyed and virtually voted out of existence in November 2016, the Demobstercratic Party therefore needs to get in still higher gear with more and more and ever increasing welfare programs, making massive vote fraud still easier, and increasing illegal immigration.

So that is the real reason that Barbara Lee, Obama, and various other members of the leadership of the DP are in favor of increasing illegal immigration.

I'm still a Democrat but will be voting for Nehring, Gold, Tuck, and Peterson along with Chang and Yee.

Both candidates for gov. are whores, so I'll leave it blank.

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

More Realty and History:

And then there is the way the GOP moved to marginalize themselves with Hispanic voters. Today Hispanics represent 16% of ordinary Americans. By 2050 they will represent 30%. No matter. Not only did the House GOP leadership refuse to bring a popular immigration reform measure to a vote that was passed by a large bi-partisan majority in the Senate. But last Friday, the Republicans also passed a bill to eliminate the Dreamer program that was established by the President to defer the deportation of children brought to America as minors who have known no other country except the USA.

Most Hispanic Americans do not think of these questions as "policy debates." They take them very personally. They believe that Republicans are not on their side, and that they don't respect their community. And when Hispanic Americans see the vitriol directed by the right wing extremists at buses containing Central American children, they know for a fact that the GOP is opposing immigration reform because much of their base simply does not like Hispanics.

If anyone had remained unconvinced that was true, the vote on the Dreamer program sealed the deal. To find something to address the children border crisis that would pass with the support of their caucus, the GOP leadership had to keep making their bill meaner and meaner until they satisfied their most extremist members.

It is likely that this vote will be a watershed moment similar to former GOP California Governor Pete Wilson's support of Prop 187 in the 1990's that turned formerly purple California into a bright blue state. Between 1960 and 1988 California voted for the Republican Presidential nominee in six of seven elections. It has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1992.

Well, our little ho-bitch has returned. Too bad. We were hoping she had gone down south with the other illegals where she belongs.

By MW:

Such leading members of the Demobstercratic Party as Barbara Lee are pretending that they are motivated by humanitarian concerns in the positions they have taken in regard to aiding, helping, and assisting. and quite likely also permanently settling in our country, the huge numbers of undocumented aliens who recently have been entering the US.

However, and just like virtually every position that the leadership of the DNC has taken for at last several decades, in other words going back to at least the1920's, the phonies, con men, and scam artists who comprise the overwhelming majority of the leadership of the DNC, and including in their latest desperate attempt to increase illegal immigration, are actually motivated by a desire to win elections, and including since they are well aware that people who are poor, uneducated, on welfare, or recent immigrants almost always vote for the DP, and while the overwhelming majority of people who are intelligent,. educated, employed, NOT on welfare, and even slightly successful overwhelming vote Republican

But the DP is in serious trouble. In other words, in recent decades more and more people have caught on to the fact that the DP is the party of lies, garbage, nonsense, stupidity, street crime, idiocy, destroyed schools and neighborhoods, crooked lawyers, and social programs that do not work.

So most likely based on recent trends, the DP would be looking at big losses in the soon November 2014 elections, and quite likely even many times drastically larger losses two years from now in the November 2016 elections.

So as to avoid being quite likely almost totally destroyed and virtually voted out of existence in November 2016, the Demobstercratic Party therefore needs to get in still higher gear with more and more and ever increasing welfare programs, making massive vote fraud still easier, and increasing illegal immigration.

So that is the real reason that Barbara Lee, Obama, and various other members of the leadership of the DP are in favor of increasing illegal immigration.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY and you know it if the sexist troll for the Tea Party can read. The latest poll shows how the majority of Americans view the subject:

The results of a Reuters/Ipsos poll highlight the complexity of the child migrant issue for Obama, who has sought to emphasize his compassion while also insisting that his administration plans to send home most of the children, many of whom have fled violence in their homelands.

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

More Realty and History:

And then there is the way the GOP moved to marginalize themselves with Hispanic voters. Today Hispanics represent 16% of ordinary Americans. By 2050 they will represent 30%. No matter. Not only did the House GOP leadership refuse to bring a popular immigration reform measure to a vote that was passed by a large bi-partisan majority in the Senate. But last Friday, the Republicans also passed a bill to eliminate the Dreamer program that was established by the President to defer the deportation of children brought to America as minors who have known no other country except the USA.

Most Hispanic Americans do not think of these questions as "policy debates." They take them very personally. They believe that Republicans are not on their side, and that they don't respect their community. And when Hispanic Americans see the vitriol directed by the right wing extremists at buses containing Central American children, they know for a fact that the GOP is opposing immigration reform because much of their base simply does not like Hispanics.

If anyone had remained unconvinced that was true, the vote on the Dreamer program sealed the deal. To find something to address the children border crisis that would pass with the support of their caucus, the GOP leadership had to keep making their bill meaner and meaner until they satisfied their most extremist members.

It is likely that this vote will be a watershed moment similar to former GOP California Governor Pete Wilson's support of Prop 187 in the 1990's that turned formerly purple California into a bright blue state. Between 1960 and 1988 California voted for the Republican Presidential nominee in six of seven elections. It has voted Democratic in every Presidential election since 1992.

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Back to reality:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Barbie Lee SHOULD feel ashamed.

She needs to call for the immediate deportation of all these illegals. Andole! Vamanos, ahora mismo!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Back to reality:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Back to reality:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

Back to reality:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Back to reality:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Polling is NOT on your side! You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

We return you to the reality of life:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Polling is NOT on your side! You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

We return you to the reality of life:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Polling is NOT on your side! You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

We return you to the reality of life:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

Polling is NOT on your side! You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

We return you to the reality of life:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

We return you to the reality of life:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

We return you to the reality of life:

Sorry again, bitch, but I aint' going nowhere--and I am in the majority. Polling is our side; congress is on our side; and sooner rather than later, a president will be on America's side.

We will be treating the Central American illegals the same as the illegals from Mexico and Canada.

Cornyn-Cuellar is going to happen, whether you like it or not! And frankly, we don't give a flying fuck whether you like it or not!

You can deny the polls all you want but here's the reality:

The poll, conducted on July 31-Aug. 5, found that 51 percent of Americans believe the unaccompanied children being detained at the U.S.-Mexico border should be allowed to remain in the country for some length of time.

That included 38 percent who thought the unaccompanied youngsters should be sheltered and cared for until it was deemed safe for them to return home. Thirteen percent said the children should be allowed to stay in the United States, while 32 percent said the children should be immediately deported.

"Overall, people are humane and they understand that no matter what our situation is with the budget, whether or not we can afford this, these are kids. No matter what the immigration system is, they are innocent," said Lance Lee, 42, of Alabama, who took part in the survey.

So, get on board Mr. conservative extremist, whether you like it or not, America has spoken and all the polls show you lose!

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Barbara Lee speaks for me! She also speaks for a majority of us including you! Most of us are moderate and not racist extremists like you. The Tea Party is losing this battle.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Reality and History:

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

Yo, bitch!

It's really a shame that you can't answer the question posited below, a very honest one. However, the ultra-left radical fringe such as you people don't hail from the school of knowledge so one needn't try to engage with you cerebrally. Need to say it again because it's the American way: after Nov., Cornyn-Cuellar is happening whether you like it or not!


We definitely agree. LEAVE IT!

Back to your war-torn, poverty-ridden countries to fix it yourselves. This country had a revolution in 1776. Go have your own. Don't be a burden on others. Since they're treking through Mexico why not stay there? Anyone thought about that? Not too likely. After all, Los Estados Unidos is 'the wealthy land!' It's all about $$$$. Don't kid yourselves.

The answer will be Cornyn-Cuellar after Nov. Unless Obama wants to be a complete lame duck, he'll get behind this bipartisan legislation which is the only answer and puts Central American illegals on par with illegals from Canada and Mexico and closes the current loophole. The Democrats will have lost congress after Nov. If Obama and Barbie Lee want to do something constructive they'll follow congress' lead after January, otherwise we run out the clock the next president will sing the song that a majority of Americans do now, 'Return to sender!'

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

Part of an AP article

Both parties agree that immigration is likely to play a bigger role in the 2016 presidential election. Arizona Sen. John McCain, the GOP nominee in 2008, has said his party can't win without supporting an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws, while former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush is among the potential candidates to urge the party to liberalize its approach to immigration.

A GOP-sanctioned "autopsy" of Mitt Romney's 2012 loss made only one policy recommendation: The party "must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," a term understood to include creating pathways to legal status for millions of immigrants living in the nation illegally.

Note-----The Republicans can't win a presidential election if they let the extreme right dictate their policies.

Post a Comment