EAST BAY CITIZEN. EVERYWHERE SINCE 2009

Thursday, May 19, 2016

Former staffer says Khanna twice stiffed him for campaign work; Khanna says it was extortion, blackmail

Ro Khanna directed his campaign to pay Bill
Ferguson for work in 2014 as token of
goodwill, not to satisfy any debt from 2004.
CONGRESS | 17TH DISTRICT |
A Santa Clara County Democratic Party insider named Bill Ferguson says Ro Khanna refused to pay him $6,000 for two months work following Khanna’s unsuccessful 2004 congressional campaign. It’s a debt emails show Khanna initially acknowledged, but now denies. Then it happened again in 2014, according to Ferguson, who was briefly employed by the Khanna campaign and paid half of what he was promised. Khanna maintains the payments in 2014 were intended to placate Ferguson and his repeatedly attempts at what Khanna called “extortion.”

Emails provided by Ferguson, however, show Khanna acknowledged he owed some sort of compensation. Starting in July 2004, just over four months following Khanna’s primary defeat that March to Lantos, Ferguson sent a cordial email to Khanna. “I've been needing to put in writing or email for you the outstanding amount due, as you requested. Here it is:” The invoice, totaling $6,000, included two $2,500 paychecks and $1,000 in miscellaneous expenses.

Bill Ferguson called Khanna "dishonest" for
not paying him on two occasions.
Khanna responded the next day: “Nice to hear from you. I’m in D.C. for a few months serving as executive director of the Indo American Council at the DNC, raising money for [John] Kerry. I have been unable to raise money for the campaign debt because everyone is focused on Kerry. but I know I owe you some money -- it will take time but I will pay. Let's catch up when I’m back in CA.”

More than a month later in August 2004, Khanna again acknowledges money owed to Ferguson and told him he was planning to “work off” earlier debts by returning to practice law. “I know that I personally owe you money, and will repay you at some point. I am a man of my words and live up to my obligations,” wrote Khanna.

In an interesting aside, in the same email Khanna tells Ferguson that while working on Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign, he met Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, then-California State Controller Steve Westly and Honda. “I've forged a close relationship with Honda. I hope he gets into the cabinet. Who do you think would be a strong contender for his seat (who is worth supporting) if that happens[?]”

Without a reply from Ferguson, Khanna sent another email two days later. “Bill, didn't hear from you. Hope you aren't mad at me.....just wanted to assure you I remember my personal obligation. Please do reply and let me know what you are up to. Very much want to help you with your run as well.”

In an interview, Khanna said Ferguson “didn’t do a damn thing” while working on his 2004 protest candidacy against then-San Mateo Rep. Tom Lantos. Ferguson was paid, nonetheless, said Khanna, except for the last month of the primary race when Khanna announced to his staff that the campaign was broke and he couldn’t pay them. Those who stayed, said Khanna, did so knowing they would not be paid.

In addition, said Khanna, if a campaign debt was still outstanding, the Federal Elections Commission would not have allowed the campaign committee to be closed. “We paid him,” said Khanna. “He keeps popping up asking for money and jobs every few years.” Later, Khanna added, “The guy didn’t do a damn thing for me. He just kept blackmailing me.”

Khanna said if he believed money was owed to Ferguson, he would pay him. “This is not about the money,” said Khanna. “I’m not going to set precedent and pay a guy for extortion.” He also believes Ferguson’s decision to come out with his story is politically-motivated and timed to come out within the last few weeks of this June primary campaign. Ferguson is now a supporter of Honda.

Meanwhile, Ferguson said Khanna is merely trying to demonize him. “He’s a lawyer and he’s really good at explaining things, said Ferguson. “This is what he does. He just makes things up.” The bottom line, said Ferguson, is “He owes me money. He didn’t pay me.” He added, “It’s the principle of the thing. It’s dishonest.”

Ferguson said he periodically dropped the matter, but would make contact with Khanna over few years to keep in touch and politely ask for payment. Khanna, however, said he doesn’t recall any contact with Ferguson until the run up to his 2014 race. In the meantime, Khanna went back to practicing law and teaching before accepting an appointment by President Obama in 2009 as assistant undersecretary for the U.S. Department of Commerce. Ferguson ran three unsuccessful campaigns for the Milpitas City Council, but gained influence as an insider within the Santa Clara County Democratic Party. He is currently a member of the county Democratic Central Committee. “I thought we were friends,” Ferguson said of Khanna. “I didn’t push it, but he kept saying, ‘I’m running for office and I’ll pay you back.’”

After Khanna briefly flirted with the idea in 2011 of challenging long-time Rep. Pete Stark the next year in the East Bay’s newly-redistricted 15th Congressional District, Khanna focused his efforts instead on Honda in 2014. In the meantime, Khanna amassed one of the largest off-year fundraising efforts in Bay Area political history. With the 2014 June primary still a year and a half away, Khanna was already swimming in nearly $2 million in campaign contributions. Figuring Khanna’s campaign coffers were good for it, Ferguson asked to be paid for his past work using the 2014 campaign’s coffers.

Khanna’s 2014 consultant Leah Cowan, though, said “it wouldn’t look right to pay him for work in 2004,” according to Ferguson. “That’s when I started to get irritated,” he added. The Khanna campaign apparently had second thoughts. “If you work on the campaign, we’ll call it consulting,” Ferguson recalls Khanna telling him. Khanna, in an interview, agreed with the characterization to essentially over-pay Ferguson for minimal work on the campaign starting in early 2014. Khanna said he approved the payments out of “goodwill” to Ferguson because he was “hard up for money,” in addition, to thanks for “taking a chance on me” against Lantos in 2004, a bid predicated on opposing the congressman’s support for the Iraq War. “Unfortunately, Bill lost that idealism to stand up to the war in Iraq and the Patriot Act,” said Khanna.

However, it is still unclear whether Ferguson viewed this as a method to recoup money for his past work, although he called the 2014 arrangement “a compromise.” Ferguson maintains Khanna still owes $6,000 from 2004. Emails from late 2014, however, suggest Khanna feared Ferguson would take the story to the press in an effort to besmirch him and his campaign. Ferguson denies ever threatening to tell his story to the press, but admits to saying he would tell other staffers and local politicos about it.

In one email from Oct. 2, 2014, after expressing an opinion that Khanna was again making an attempt to avoid paying him, Ferguson wrote, “Ro, I really need you to take care of this. I have been talking and talking with you and Leah. I’ve been friendly and not caused any problems. Please, can we just solve this and get it over with?” At this point, Ferguson said he was only paid one installment of the four agreed $1,500 payments. On Oct. 20, 2014, Ferguson wrote, “Again, I’ve not publicized this, but I feel I’m just getting the runaround from you. And I have walked many weekends, additional, for you.”

With Election Day just two weeks away, Ferguson wrote to Khanna on Oct. 22, 2014, “Ro, you still don’t get back to me. I’m ready to assume that you’re fucking with me. That you’re telling Leah to lead me on and pretend like you’re planning on paying me. That you would like to do this thru Election Day.” Later in the same email, Ferguson, added, “I guess my next step would be to start telling people. I’ll start with telling your staff what is happening and ask them to pressure you. I’ve tried and tried to be nice. And it’s not getting me anywhere. Ro, PAY ME NOW.” The email was signed, “Please, Bill.”

Ferguson eventually received a second $1,500 check in late October, but in another email to Khanna, he referenced two more future payments. “Ro, Thank you for the check for $1,500. I did receive it last week. That’s good. Thank you. So, we’re now up to half. I would like you to tell me the plan for the next half.” Ferguson contends he actually did work on Khanna’s 2014 campaign, primarily door-to-door canvassing. However, he said he no longer was personally supporting Khanna’s candidacy against Honda at the time, not after the manner in which Khanna had treated him over the years. Khanna said he doesn’t believe Ferguson did any tangible work in 2014. Meanwhile, Ferguson never received the additional $3,000 he said was promised to him in 2014. In an interview, Ferguson said he dropped the matter, but felt used by Khanna for a second time. “They made me work more,” Ferguson said of the 2014 deal. “I feel like they were taking advantage of me again because I still wasn’t paid for the $6,000 they owed [from 2004].”

If any animosity between Ferguson and Khanna exists, Khanna sure does not recognize it. That’s because in January of this year, Khanna asked for Ferguson’s endorsement to unseat Honda. According to an email from Khanna on Jan. 19, he wrote, “I'd love to chat and earn your support if you are willing. Would love to catch up.” Ferguson said he never responded.

15 comments :

Dirty! I thought Ro is a man of his word?

So, the story continues:

1999: Won an election to become student council president at the University of Chicago. He to resign weeks later, for admitted campaign funding violations.

2004: used Bill Clinton's picture on an ad without permission and was reprimanded by a former President of the United States, of his own party. Bill Clinton was so angry, he flew out to California to endorse Tom Lantos.

2014: His campaign (money supporters) got two fake Republicans on the ballot to dilute the Republican vote for Vanila Singh (R) who was briefly beating Ro in a Poll. One of the fake candidates was a Wilson & Sonsini (same law firm Ro worked for) lawyer, who was then with Google. The Mercury News well covered this issue. This was clear manipulations of the election by cluttering up the ballot with fake republican candidates. Ro will fit right in in Congress.

So, then there is this story... it falls right in line with Ro's way of doing political business.

Ron Cohen for Congress 2016 (R) roncohenforcongress2016.com Go Trump!

Wow, what a sorry little story.

It was pretty sad to be griping in 2014 about a stale $6k services invoice to a 2004 anti-war campaign that ran out of money a month before the election. http://www.thenation.com/article/antiwar-primary-challenge/

But it’s pathetic to still be griping about that same issue after being voluntarily (!!) paid at least half of the disputed amount years after the statute of limitations had long ago barred a legal claim.

And “Ferguson contends he actually did work on Khanna’s 2014 campaign, primarily door-to-door canvassing.” That’s called volunteer work. Much of it done by teenagers. You call that paid work by an adult?

This is clearly politically motivated sour grapes, nothing else.

Steve, don’t start getting the reputation for being the mouthpiece for “gadflies” and loose canons. You are better than that!

By MW:

I believe Khanna is a lawyer. Lawyers have well deserved beyond horrible reputations when it comes to paying their bills.

For more information on that, talk to shorthand reporters who record transcripts at hearings, and such as for example depositions, that lawyers are present at, and ask then what their experiences have been as far as getting lawyers to pay their bills.

In fact some years ago I had a unit for rent and a lawyer applied to be the tenant. So I drew up a rental agreement, and then before presenting it to the prospective tenant, showed it to a lawyer I trusted for finetuning and his comments.

When that honest lawyer I showed it to (yes, believe it or not, there are a few honest and reputable lawyers, although not many) learned that I was planning on renting to a lawyer, his opinion was that I should think long and hard before agreeing to rent to a lawyer, since it was opinion that an extremely high percentage of lawyers were crooks, scumbags, scam artists, professional pathological liars, and total sleazeballs. Ask Bill and Hillary Clinton for details.

Dear Anon 9:39 ... the point is that Ro didn't keep his word. Somehow there was an agreement at one point that Ferguson was to be paid for rendering whatever services. Ro confirmed it in writing multiple times. If he didn't think living up to his word would bite him in the ass, he has no business running for public office. Of course it was gonna come out. The only reason it didn't come out last election was cuz Ferguson was supporting Ro for whatever reason.

Sad!

I worked on Ro's campaign in 2004, and was inspired by his anti-war efforts. Ferguson did absolutely nothing. There were all these idealistic kids working on it, and Ferguson just wanted a paycheck and complained how he just got let go from his previous job and needed money to make ends meet. He was the only one who wanted money. Ro paid him in 2007 out of his own pocket before going to the Obama Administration. I told him it would do no good. Ferguson then kept quiet until he read in the press that Ro had raised money --nearly 10 years after the 2014 race. Ro's campaign paid him again out of good will. It's really sad that Ferguson has become a hatchet man for the powers that be in the Santa Clara party. He has become the perpetual guy to do oppo research and leak oppo research against anyone the machine doesn't endorse.

Anonymous 10:40. This is something for Judge Judy at best. He said, she said. To consider that a grown adult would be carping about $3,000 twelve years down the road is sad. To cover it as a “news story” is disturbing.

LOL! This "story" is so stupid! This is obviously politically orchestrated. I'm actually surprised Steve Tavares spent the time and energy writing this.

The comment threads is the place the Khanna "volunteers" go because no one else will listen.

Look, you'll probably win this thing bc Honda got himself into ethical hot water. Question you've gotta ask is why RK is so bad at being a hustler.

Cheating on a college election that no one cares about? Admitting in writing - after finishing Yale Law - that you owe a guy money.

If this fellow is just a gadfly, why ask for his endorsement? And if Tavares is just a mouthpiece for gadflies...why go on his podcast?

Maybe because no one cares about a race where the main challenger doesn't have a message...maybe it's because the campaign sends out tons of press releases and bores the press with nonsense...

Tell us again: why replace a senior MOC w/ a freshman who has the same positions?

Let's be honest. Honda took Khanna under his wing and helped him money for that possible run against Pete Stark. Instead, Khanna turned around and stabbed Honda in the back and ran against him instead. Many of Khanna's donors were upset about this and demanded their money back. Of course, none of them saw their money either.

This story isn't a big deal, and I agree with RK's supporters that it seems fishy for this person to be bringing it up so many years later. It does smell of blackmail.

But what is revelatory about this little story is that RK doesn't treat people well. That's the only thing people should take away from this. I honestly feel sorry for my district. We will have a choice between a guy who is literally asleep at the wheel, uses his taxpayer funded staff to run his political campaigns, and a self-aggrandizing carpetbagger who has no voting record and has questionable morals.

By MW:

According to 5:45, of the two major candidates either one would be a very bad choice. If that is really the situation in the Honda versus Khanna race, then it is the same exact situation the voters are faced with in most elections.

In other words pick your poison, and the only two beverages we are offering are cyanide and arsenic.

By MW:

Just in case Khanna is telling the truth in regard to his statements that a former staffer subjected him to blackmaii, then, and if Khanna is a lawyer, and based on the "standards" of the so called "legal profession," what the former staffer did to Khanna was "outrageous."


More specifically, the way things are supposed to work is that lawyers, and including with the assistance of the totally corrupt California State Bar and corrupt judges they have close relationships with, are supposed to rip off members of the general public, but ordinary members of the general public are not allowed to do anything that lawyers dislike, or even say anything that might hurt the tender sensitive feelings of those parasites, scumbags, scam artists, and sleazy bloodsucking leeches that composes the overwhelming majority of the so called "legal profession."

For instance ask John Keker, and who is one of SF's most prominent lawyers, also pretends to be a "liberal," and is far and away the most prominent person in the powerhouse law firm known as Keker & VanNest, whether he tried to destroy the lives of the whistleblowers who had the "gall" and the "nerve" to tell the truth about Lance Armstrong and Armstrong's use of illegal drugs.

Keker, of course, can entertain us by insisting that: one, he actually thought Armstrong was innocent of the charges; and two, he did not have an understanding with Armstrong that as long as Armstrong paid him huge sums of money, that he would declare all out war against and try to destroy anybody and everybody who told the truth about Armstrong's use of illegal drugs.

(NOTE: If it was up to me, any lawyer who told lies about a whistleblower and/or tried to destroy the life of a whistleblower would receive a lifetime prison sentence.)

Post a Comment